The Fair Rights Foundation to Science & Theology

Freeeing Schools from hate crime

The Fair Rights Foundation to Science & Theology

'The Fair Rights Foundation to Science & Theology' shows how to prove our universe has a fair rights foundation in court, see the book back cover. This book is a second edition to 'The General Theory of Reality' first published in 2014 by me. The change in title reflects that the book constitutes the theory of everything for courts, going beyond the case previously offered courts to end natural history due to partial oversights described in the book. See the tabs on Book Science and Book Theology below.

The author is a PhD. physicist reporting negligence and rights violations to scientific theories of everything. A fair trial is the nucleus to this book, even by a generalisation of Einstein’s work, p8. Material physics spectacularly lacks absolute rigour, pii. Law and science can be unified using the hypothesis ‘Law is Science’, p0. The cover sets a miniaturist overview on proving rights cosmology in court. It shows the deep legal science of rights to ‘God’s word’ beyond chance and hate crime. Thus, Judgement Day is more likely than a natural end for our life. Only fair trials may establish spiritual reality, p1. Court accreditation of scientists is raised, p42. A theory of spiritual relativity in music illustrates spiritual forces on minds.

Front Cover

Stacks Image 3774
Price £7.99,
Postage £2.95 UK, £7.99 Europe, £10.99 Rest of World

Back Cover

Stacks Image 3815
BOOK CONTENTS
(below the main book referred to for added depth is Book 2 'The Just proof of God' in navigation menu)

Colloquial Frontispiece to Outline
The Fair Rights Foundation to Science & Theology ………………………… ii

Book conventions on page, chapter & section references leading in to
Fair Minded verses Propaganda Schools : the Test of Gay-Rights …… vi

Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………..…. vii

The Meaning of Life Under Hypothesis of 'Law is Science' …………………. p0
The Judgement Day that Democracy & a Free-Press Witness to ………….. p1
Letter for Journalists ……………………………………………………………… p3
The General Theory of Reality (on perjurious sciences & their myths) …….. p8
Axiomatic Justice & Science (natural history as cult delusion) ……………… p11

THE CASE TO END NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................... p13
CASE ITEM A : Letter to a hypothetical reasonable people of negligence law ... p14
CASE ITEM B : Press release on Two Tests to End Natural History… p16
CASE ITEM C : Expansion on items A & B ..(§15.16 main book) ...... p19
CASE ITEM D : Letter to a fair judge …………………………………… p42

A natural world is infinitely unlikely: two bids to explain:
Argument for God by Fair Design-Gay Rights ………………………….. p47
Bracket on Life by Blind Luck ..(§15.13 main book) .......................... p52

To believe in a natural world is deathly evil: two bids to explain:
The Ethics of Natural Scientists ..(§12.2 main book) ......................... p57
The Cult of Natural Science ..(§15.1 main book) ............................... p62

Spiritual Relativity in Music ..(chapter 14 main book)........................ p65

BOOK SCIENCE : Fair Science does not cherry pick data or causes to falsify a theory. Below is some bibliography on scientific partiality or cherry picking to the foundation for 'science' in vogue today.


Kline bewails in his book 'Mathematics The Loss of Certainty' p277 that Gòˆdel's 1931 proofs imply truth is not in mathematics. Physicists use mathematics for a cosmology of material forces ignoring spiritual forces. But to cherry-pick forces risks hate crimes! see area A of the back cover. It by no means proves a material reality.
Kline p337 sees that even Einstein has not a faintest idea (no material explanation so spiritual in concept) of what electromagnetic waves we model are?
Nobel laureate John Bell frets in his book 'Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics' chapter 3 that in best theory, ‘elementary’ particles transcend space & time to set reality to us by ‘moral’ judgement. It poses supernatural arbitration on our objects, e.g. by beat of a butterfly’s wings.
In 'The Just Proof of God' §1.10 etc. I see that all models run by life of a modeller’s mind, if not God’s mind for origins, whose? Newton’s proof for God is reset there at §6.16 within my full fair proof, §1.5. Newton’s proof helps trap expert scientific witness or science funding over cherry picking partiality to falsify the case for a natural world, p13.
By fair court discipline, see area D back cover, science actually has a rights foundation to oppose scientific hate crime led by superstitious fear, pvi.



BOOK THEOLOGY : Crown scriptures ask a fair reading of life and religion to mandate Judgment Day, see area F back cover. A concise statement describing Rights Theology is set below.


In rights-theology, to lie & die is a rights-bid of evil in a law-enacting title-contest for souls with a fair Almighty as Wis. 1, 13-16; 1 Cor. 15, 26, Luke 10, 18-21, John 10, 10 cover. A fair God lets life invent Death for theme-parks to play death-games, Prov. 8, 36, Mat. 5, 45, Jn 12, 25. Hell is for dark forces of depression that bar fair science. Its devil guides evolution of fledgeling-gods to rule ‘sin’ like him as God’s left-hand overlord, Gen. 3, 5, Job 1, 8-12, to gods of death on ‘sins’ that fail evil causes. God thus gives evil right to define evil’s nature in law, even by a title contest outside hell to depose Justice as a fair Spirit: a fair Jewish spirit (Messiah?), a fair gay spirit (Messiah?, p47), etc.. Our evidence is one set of data giving choice of a partial or fair Lord, p19, Mark 12. In the contest after WWII, gays out in a rainbow-front against dark schools partial on facts of gay life. Some little angels ask rights for love to open a path to God beyond ‘naughty-devil’ teachers. See ‘bottom line for courts’ on cover.

The prime question of fair rights is whether a natural end to life is less likely for us than Judgement Day? See p13 for how a fair court may judge it for us.